Graphic Organizer:
Comparing a Nonfiction Text (NFT) Click Clack Moo Cows
That Type by Doreen Cronin, with a Fiction Text (FT) Farm Animals: Cows by
Emily Green
Parts of the text
|
Similarities
|
Differences
|
Supports ELLs
|
Challenging for ELLs
|
Title of the book
|
Both titles tell the reader what the book is going to be
about
|
The NFT title to entertain and the FT title to inform
|
The FT title is concrete, and the picture on the cover
supports what the book will be about.
|
The NFT title and picture could be confusing to ELLs- the
word ‘Type’ with the visual of a typewriter will need to be explained
|
Structure
|
Both texts provide information.
|
The FT text has a beginning, middle and end-as many
‘stories’ do.
The NFT text has a table of contents, glossary and
index. It also has important
words in bold print to emphasize them.
|
Learning and understanding the structures of FT and NFT
texts will support ELLs. The
structures of the NFT text are straight forward, and can be mini-lesson to
help with understanding.
Pre-teaching would be easier with a NFT text. The way the FT text reads is more
similar to the oral language an ELL is used to hearing- more of a ‘story’
format.
|
ELLs will need to have the story elements of the FT text
explicitly taught. Understanding of characters, setting, plot and sequencing
of the story could be confusing and difficult. The NFT text might not be as engaging or entertaining for
students, and might not be as familiar because of their exposure to it.
|
Pictures
|
Both text have picture to support the story
|
The NFT text has real photographs and the FT text has
illustrations.
|
The photographs in the NFT text will support ELL learners
as the pictures match what they are reading about cows.
|
The illustrations in the FT are fun to look at, but are
not as straightforward in helping ELLs with vocabulary and understanding what
the story is saying.
|
Vocabulary
Content
|
Both texts have vocabulary that will need to be taught
before ELLs will be able to understand.
|
The vocabulary in the NFT text are one word definitions
that need to be taught and are supported by pictures (for example, ‘udder’)
where in the FT text it is more about understanding concepts (for example
going on ‘strike’)
|
Both texts have visuals that will support learning the
vocabulary. The NFT text has a Table of contents, a glossary and an index
that can support vocabulary development.
|
The vocabulary challenges in the FT text will come from
ELLs not understanding the underlying messages being taught and from having
trouble making inferences. The
figurative language in this text will also make it difficult to fully
understand. In the NFT some of
the technical language might be challenging.
|
Overall I believe that the salient features of the
nonfiction text are more supportive for our ELLs. The pictures, vocabulary, content, and structure of this
text would provide more direct, concrete support that would be easier to
understand and teach. The fiction
text would however be more enjoyable and have more in common with their oral
language development. Regardless of the type of text being introduced or taught
it is clear that as teachers we must provide our ELLs with the background
knowledge they will need to comprehend.
Jonna,
ReplyDeleteBoth genres can offer challenges and support for our ELLs. You have described both and have come up with strategies to use both. Thanks for posting!
Donna